Page Summary
joshinator.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kristen-mara.livejournal.com - (no subject)
freddiejoey.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rodlox.livejournal.com - (no subject)
natchris.livejournal.com - (no subject)
flaccidduck.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fredbassett - (no subject)
judithjohn.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dreamer-98.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fififolle - (no subject)
samueljames - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2012-05-10 10:28 pm (UTC)Thanks for the endeavour
no subject
Date: 2012-05-11 06:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-11 12:35 am (UTC)Thanks - wow, that was a huge article!
LOL at 'Stephen Murray'. And that was great about Ben Miller
no subject
Date: 2012-05-11 06:17 pm (UTC)There are a few errors in it - like Mark Ryan ;) Hee Ben Miller ftw.
Hee, still got one bit from this magazine to post, but I'll probably wait until the teamfest.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-11 04:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-11 06:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-11 05:10 am (UTC)you rule!
no subject
Date: 2012-05-11 06:20 pm (UTC)*bows*
no subject
Date: 2012-05-11 07:59 am (UTC)Thank you for sharing.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-11 06:19 pm (UTC)Glad to
once I convinced LJ to co-operateno subject
Date: 2012-05-11 08:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-11 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-11 08:47 am (UTC)Not very accurate with names, though, mainly misspellings and mix ups, I think, like Mark Ryan. But great that Ryan gets a mention here along side Lester.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-11 06:22 pm (UTC)Hee, not really. Go Ryan and Lester ;)
Glad you liked the article.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-11 10:29 am (UTC)I appreciate being able to read this.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-11 06:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-11 07:18 pm (UTC)It's interesting how at that time they weren't interested in bringing the human element to traveling through the anomalies; obviously changed their minds along the way.
Interesting also to read the concerns they had about Abby, Connor and Rex. I can understand people's hesitations about Hannah (although she turned out to be great), but I didn't think about the whole Rex-as-a-Disney-caricature thing, and Connor as a geek possibly making fun of Sci-Fi fans.
Thanks for posting!
no subject
Date: 2012-05-12 03:50 pm (UTC)Hannah turned out very well, I suppose they thought people might take Connor to wrong way (as a poke at fans?) and see Rex as to human-ised?
Your welcome.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-11 07:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-12 03:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-16 08:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-16 09:13 pm (UTC)